Strategies for Peer Review
By
Katelyn Fish
One of the most powerful tools for writing has been
stifled in the classroom simply because we don’t know how to correctly
implement it.
This tool is peer review. The idea itself is
simple—just have students read and comment on each other’s writing—but hidden
within this simplicity is a vehicle for learning that can get student papers
from apathetic essays to genuine pieces of writing. As a pre-service teacher, I
feel a strong need to make sure that peer-review time is not wasted in my
classroom. Yet like all tools, peer review is only as effective as its
implementation. Let’s look at a few different ways to use peer review in the
secondary school classroom.
5
STRATEGIES FOR PEER REVIEW
1. Sentence
Stems
We typically don’t expect
students to instinctively know how to engage in academic discourse or
debate—which is why we explicitly teach them how to interact in this way. When
students are first introduced to Socratic Seminars, they experience the most
success when the teachers scaffold the experience by modeling the process and
providing the students with ideas for how to share their ideas. For example,
they may receive a printed handout like the following:
Such handouts give
students a script as they learn how to share their ideas in appropriate ways. So
why don’t we give students the same benefits when we introduce peer review? Too
often, it is easy to assume that students already know how to provide feedback
for each other. But what if they don’t? By providing students with sentence
stems, they will be more capable of giving effective feedback to their peers, and
peer review time will no longer be wasted. Your peer-review handout could look
something like this:
2. Praise-Question-Polish
(PQP)
Have students use this technique for
a focused peer review session. There are a few ways to implement this. One way
is to separate students into small groups. Students should take turns reading
their writing aloud, which allows the student to “hear the piece in another
voice and to identify possible changes independently” (ReadWriteThink.org). The
listeners then take a few moments to fill out the PQP form, identifying spots
of effective writing (and commenting on WHY it works), writing specific
questions, and then distinct suggestions for revision. These PQP forms are
given to the relevant student for reference during the revision process. You
can learn more about the PQP process, as well as access lesson plans that use
this strategy, here.
3. Stations
While we often associate rotating
stations with elementary school, they can be effective in the secondary school
setting as well. You can create a series of stations that will be most helpful
to your students. Do they struggle with sentence structure? With word choice? With
topic sentences? With forming thesis statements? Select a few categories that
you know your students would benefit from extra practice in, and create task
cards for each station (for examples of revision station task cards, click here).
In class, divide students into groups and give them a specific amount of time
allotted per station (or, if you are feeling particularly brave, let them work
through at their own pace, like this
teacher did). You can assign groups randomly or, because
“sharing writing is a risk,” have students tell you one or two people they
would be comfortable working with and establish groups that way (Hovan 51).
Make sure that you include peer and teacher review stations into the rotation,
OR, after the students have completed the main stations, let them choose one to
return to and have peers read their paper, specifically focusing on potential
revisions for that station.
This is a really cool
online platform that allows students to submit their work to the teacher, give
anonymous feedback, and engage with feedback on their own work by responding or
“liking” the comments. Best of all, the teacher can track all of these
interactions! This makes it easy to give participation points and see the level
of revision thinking that students are implementing into their work. The
essential features are free, but you can access
additional tools with the Basic plan ($2 per student per
year) or the Pro plan ($5 per student per year).
5. Peer
Review Rubric
One in-depth application of sentence
starters is the peer review rubric. Whether you co-create this with your
students or formulate one yourself, it is sure to help students learn how to be
powerful peer reviewers. Rather than just giving an overall opinion of their
peer’s work (i.e. “Great job!” or “Nice work!”), students have questions to
answer and specific topics to consider. It’s like a “ticket” quota for a
cop—students have to find a certain amount of errors or potential revisions in
their friend’s writing, so they are forced to be picky. For sample rubric
questions, look here.
For ideas on how to turn your grading rubric into a peer-review rubric, check this
out.
Try incorporating one of these techniques into your
classroom. See if you get a better response than “I like it.” Let us know in
the comments below!
Works
Cited
Gardner,
Traci. “Peer Review: Narrative.” ReadWriteThink.
http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/peer-review-narrative-122.html.
Accessed 19 Oct. 2018.
Hovan, Gretchen. “Writing for a built-in
audience: Writing groups in the middle school classroom.” Voices from
the Middle, vol. 20, iss. 2, pg.
49-53. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1288617200?accountid=4488.
“How
to Use Revisions Stations in the Writers Workshop.” 19 Oct. 2017. https://www.teachwriting.org/612th/2017/10/16/revisions-stations-in-the-writing-workshop.
Kunkel,
Pamela. “Turning Matrix Rubrics into Feedback Rubrics.” PeerGrade. 9 Oct. 2017. https://www.peergrade.io/blog/hacking-peergrade-matrix-rubrics/?nabe=5781754177912832:1&utm_referrer=https://www.google.com/.
Learning
in Room 213. “Revision Learning Stations.” 3 March 2016. http://reallearningroom213.blogspot.com/2016/03/revision-learning-stations.html.
Lighting
the Way to Success. “Socratic Seminar Sentence Starters.” https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Socratic-Seminar-Sentence-Starters-1138789.
Accessed 20 Oct. 2018.
PeerGrade.
“Pricing.” https://www.peergrade.io/pricing/?nabe=5781754177912832:1.
Accessed 18 Oct. 2018.
Wind,
David Kofoed. “Five Ways to Make Peer Feedback Effective in Your Classroom.” 12
Feb. 2018. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-02-12-five-ways-to-make-peer-feedback-effective-in-your-classroom.
Comments
Post a Comment